The coalition has finally wised up to the fact it's done nothing
but annoy the fairer sex since the last election. It must be time for a
patronizing strategy!
A leaked memo,
circulated to government departments in the past few days, outlines
possible actions and details the need to "assemble a first-rate team" to
develop the most effective strategy possible, with the aim of bringing
"good news for the next generation", recognising "what women do" and
underlining that "women are key to British growth and success".
Sounds good, right? In the months leading up to the
2010 General Election, we heard over and over that women's votes were
key and that the parties were going to do all they could to get us on
board. Unfortunately, this seemed to play out as little more than a few
soundbites on issues related to children - as if that's all we care
about. The press responded in the same way, speaking to women voters
about issues they were interested in, but making it all about nurseries
and child benefit, keeping all other issues - the supposedly "big"
issues, firmly as "men's issues".
Obviously childcare in the UK is a major issue, as the recent news stories
about the fact it's the most expensive in Europe and extent to which it
is forcing families into debt show. But plenty of women I know felt
sidelined and patronized back in 2010 - and they feel much more strongly
about it now, with the government cuts having disproportionately impacted women.
Cameron and co. seem to have finally worked this out
- and it's no surprise, seeing as recent polls show that just 18% of
18-24 year-old women support the Tories, compared to 30% in 2010, with
support for the Lib Dems having fallen from 34% to just 8%. And so
they're concocting a plan to encourage us to put our faith in them
again.
Says the memo: "We know from a range of polls that
women are significantly more negative about the government than men". It
goes on to say that there are many coalition policies that "are seen as
having affected women, or their interests, disproportionately". It goes
on to say that they've recognised they haven't really lived up to their
promise to be the "most family-friendly government ever".
I have to say, it's nice that those in charge
finally seem to be catching on, 18 months after women's groups and some
politicians started saying that the cuts would hit women the hardest -
because at the time there was precious little concern from Dave et al.
And so a list of ideas - from banning advertising aimed at children to
promoting women in business and reconsidering the decision not to
criminalize forced marriage - has been drawn up.
There's just one little thing. Does the memo point
to a genuine concern for the issues women care about and the damage the
coalition is currently doing with its cuts and its dismissal of gender
issues? Or is it simply a cynical ploy to turn around falling approval
ratings and claw back the support that women have withdrawn over the
last 18 months?
I'd say it's the latter. Why? For a start, Cameron
needs to look at the way he and his colleagues are treating the women
they work with, not just the electorate. There was Cameron's "calm down, dear" riposte to Angela Eagle back in April. Last week, we watched aghast as he quipped that Nadine Dorries was "frustrated"
during Prime Minister's Question Time, then sat back as his cronies
sniggered like 15-year-old boys. I have no love for the thoroughly
unpleasant Dorries, but she didn't deserve to be treated like that.
Secondly, the fact the content of the memo clearly
comes as a response to lack of support and the fact the coalition has
gained a terrible reputation among most women speaks for itself. It's
all about approval ratings, gaining power and preserving their
reputation. It's a bit insulting, to be honest. So the women are
revolting? Throw them a bone! Big up women in business and chuck in a
few platitudes about women being "the future". That'll make 'em vote for
us come the next polling day!
I'd like to see lots of the ideas in the memo become
reality. It's just sad that they have to be dreamt up as a "tactic" by
politicians who have realised just how angry women are with them, rather
than politicians who thought this stuff up in the first place because
they really do see women as "the future".
I didn't vote Conservative in 2010, and I'm pretty
sure the plan to "up the game" on communications, using these ideas as a
"hook" to draw us in, isn't going to change who I give my vote to next
time. And I know I'm not the only one. Sadly for the coalition, I don't
think the majority of women will be as easily placated as they think.
This post originally appeared at BitchBuzz. Image via The Prime Minister's Office on Flickr.
2 comments:
I voted Lib Dem at the last election. I will not being doing that again.
I think I might give my vote to any political party that realises I am a woman rather than just the potential use of my womb. I wonder if such a thing exists?
What gherkingirl said. It's disturbing watching those videos. How much of an Old Boys Club is government and where do they learn how to act like this? Does David respect Sam? Is the way he behaves in the second video just to appease his pals? Oh it's a mess.
Post a comment (2)